Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video177 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Job Losses results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 58 hits. Analysis detected 311 faulty-reasoning hits from 708 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (5,242 of 15,448 topics). This Job Losses is worse (more manipulative) than 66.10% of the peer group.
Job Losses
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 708
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

66% percentile
025507510066.1% percentile
4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles708 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.2%8.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.8%6.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.0%3.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.0%4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 1.7%1.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 2.8%2.8%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 3.7%3.7%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 6.8%6.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos