Topic summary
⁠61%1 analyzed article/video835 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Job Displacement results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Slippery Slope as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 440 hits. Analysis detected 2,253 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,340 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (10,523 of 22,217 topics). This Job Displacement is worse (more manipulative) than 52.60% of the peer group.
Job Displacement
Topic details
Total words: 3,340
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

53% percentile
025507510052.6% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.6%4.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 13.2%13.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 8.1%8.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Red Herring: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Personal Incredulity: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos