Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,018 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jimmy Kimmel Joked Rudy Giuliani Grave Critical Condition results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Appeal to Emotion, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 20.2% saturation with 824 hits. Analysis detected 4,505 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,072 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (6,437 of 16,562 topics). This Jimmy Kimmel Joked Rudy Giuliani Grave Critical Condition is worse (more manipulative) than 61.10% of the peer group.
Jimmy Kimmel Joked Rudy Giuliani Grave Critical Condition
Topic details
Total words: 4,072
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

61% percentile
025507510061.1% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 20.2%20.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.1%9.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 9.5%9.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 7.6%7.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 20.2%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 9.5%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%Recency Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 2.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Bandwagon: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.2%Tu Quoque: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Straw Man: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos