Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,791 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jimmy Kimmel Donald Trump Melania Controversy results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 496 hits. Analysis detected 2,574 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,373 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 8% (15,268 of 16,562 topics). This Jimmy Kimmel Donald Trump Melania Controversy is better (less manipulative) than 92.20% of the peer group.
Jimmy Kimmel Donald Trump Melania Controversy
Topic details
Total words: 5,373
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

8% percentile
02550751007.8% percentile
1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.2%9.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.1%0.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate