Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Jewish Day Camp results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Halo Effect, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 123 hits. Analysis detected 1,053 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,448 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Jewish Day Camp is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Jewish Day Camp
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,448
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.3%7.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 3.9%3.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 8.5%8.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Composition/Division: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.3%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos