Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,439 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jersey-City results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 25% saturation with 1,069 hits. Analysis detected 6,202 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,277 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (5,631 of 16,494 topics). This Jersey-City is worse (more manipulative) than 65.90% of the peer group.
Jersey-City
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,277
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

66% percentile
025507510065.9% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.4%11.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 11.8%11.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.4%10.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.8%5.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 8.9%8.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 25.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 15.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Tu Quoque: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.2%Horn Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.0%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos