Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video487 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jerry Seinfeld Son Julian Hamptons Rare Outing results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Overconfidence Bias, and Halo Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 160 hits. Analysis detected 1,103 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,948 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (11,162 of 16,562 topics). This Jerry Seinfeld Son Julian Hamptons Rare Outing is better (less manipulative) than 67.40% of the peer group.
Jerry Seinfeld Son Julian Hamptons Rare Outing
Topic details
Total words: 1,948
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

33% percentile
025507510032.6% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.2%8.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 6.6%6.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.3%Red Herring: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos