Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video592 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jeremiah Smith results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, In-Group Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 38% saturation with 899 hits. Analysis detected 4,800 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,368 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (3,158 of 16,562 topics). This Jeremiah Smith is worse (more manipulative) than 80.90% of the peer group.
Jeremiah Smith
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,368
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

81% percentile
025507510080.9% percentile
5.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 38.0%38.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.9%9.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 17.2%17.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 11.6%11.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 15.7%15.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.2%6.2%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 6.2%6.2%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 8.3%8.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 38.0%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 17.9%, sitewide 19.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 17.2%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 15.7%, sitewide 8.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 9.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 2.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 0.0%Straw Man: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 0.9%Anecdotal: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos