Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Jennifer Siebel Newsom results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 71% saturation with 1,555 hits. Analysis detected 7,882 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,190 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Jennifer Siebel Newsom is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Jennifer Siebel Newsom
Topic details
Total words: 2,190
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 71.0%71.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 43.1%43.1%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 29.4%29.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 35.7%35.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 37.2%37.2%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Topic 18.3%18.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 21.2%21.2%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 13.0%13.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 10.4%10.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 71.0%, sitewide 5.3%Ad Hominem: Topic 43.1%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity Bias: Topic 37.2%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 35.7%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 29.4%, sitewide 1.4%Framing Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 21.2%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 18.7%, sitewide 15.9%Horn Effect: Topic 18.3%, sitewide 1.0%Straw Man: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.9%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos