Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,349 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jennifer Lopez results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 766 hits. Analysis detected 3,967 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,396 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (11,723 of 15,447 topics). This Jennifer Lopez is better (less manipulative) than 75.90% of the peer group.
Jennifer Lopez
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,396
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

24% percentile
025507510024.1% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.1%3.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.3%12.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 14.2%14.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos