Topic summary
⁠79%1 analyzed article/video858 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jennie's Performance results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Halo Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.9% saturation with 684 hits. Analysis detected 3,420 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,432 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (6,012 of 22,974 topics). This Jennie's Performance is worse (more manipulative) than 73.80% of the peer group.
Jennie's Performance
Topic details
Total words: 3,432
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

74% percentile
025507510073.8% percentile
3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 19.9%19.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.9%3.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 11.3%11.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 19.9%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.3%False Dilemma: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Horn Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos