Topic summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Jelly Roll results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Self-Serving Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 1,492 hits . Analysis detected 9,394 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,302 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 15,540 topics). This Jelly Roll is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Jelly Roll
Topic details
Total words: 10,302
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.6% 6.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 14.5% 14.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 3.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.2%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst