Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,180 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jeffrey Epstein Files results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 34% saturation with 2,198 hits. Analysis detected 9,082 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,464 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (5,682 of 16,562 topics). This Jeffrey Epstein Files is worse (more manipulative) than 65.70% of the peer group.
Jeffrey Epstein Files
Topic details
Total words: 6,464
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

66% percentile
025507510065.7% percentile
3.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 34.0%34.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 15.7%15.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 21.3%21.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.8%1.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 8.5%8.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 34.0%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 21.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 15.7%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.6%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos