Topic summary
⁠36%1 analyzed article/video975 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jefferson Parish results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Appeal to Emotion, and Self-Serving Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 221 hits. Analysis detected 1,286 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,925 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠27% (12,239 of 16,562 topics). This Jefferson Parish is better (less manipulative) than 73.90% of the peer group.
Jefferson Parish
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,925
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

26% percentile
025507510026.1% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.7%1.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.6%5.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.4%Circular Reasoning: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos