Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video493 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jeff Probst Brother Scott Died results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Halo Effect, and Self-Serving Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 22.7% saturation with 447 hits. Analysis detected 1,427 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,972 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (5,902 of 16,562 topics). This Jeff Probst Brother Scott Died is worse (more manipulative) than 64.40% of the peer group.
Jeff Probst Brother Scott Died
Topic details
Total words: 1,972
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

64% percentile
025507510064.4% percentile
3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.7%10.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 22.7%22.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.7%1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.6%1.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 9.1%9.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 22.7%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos