Topic summary
⁠97%1 analyzed article/video446 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jd Vance Interview results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Hasty Generalization, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 152 hits. Analysis detected 1,655 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,338 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (4,498 of 16,562 topics). This Jd Vance Interview is worse (more manipulative) than 72.80% of the peer group.
Jd Vance Interview
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠73%Jd Vance Interview (selected)5%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 1,338
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

73% percentile
025507510072.8% percentile
4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.3%9.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 9.9%9.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.5%10.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 6.0%6.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 7.7%7.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 1.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 3.7%Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Straw Man: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos