Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Japanese Politics results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 204 hits . Analysis detected 1,113 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,452 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Japanese Politics is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Japanese Politics
Topic details
Total words: 1,452
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.6% 11.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.9% 7.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 14.1% 14.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 9.7% 9.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 15.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 14.1%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.6% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst