Topic summary
⁠28%1 analyzed article/video1,155 analyzed words
BS Summary: These January 6th Investigations results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and In-Group Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 569 hits. Analysis detected 3,453 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,620 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (12,607 of 21,683 topics). This January 6th Investigations is better (less manipulative) than 58.10% of the peer group.
January 6th Investigations
Topic details
Total words: 4,620
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

42% percentile
025507510041.9% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.7%6.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 12.3%12.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%No True Scotsman: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos