Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These James Ellroy results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Overconfidence Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 516 hits . Analysis detected 4,495 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,040 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,312 topics). This James Ellroy is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. James Ellroy
Topic details
Total words: 7,040
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst