Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Jail Staffing results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Self-Serving Bias , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 348 hits . Analysis detected 1,904 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,676 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Jail Staffing is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Jail Staffing
Topic details
Total words: 2,676
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 13.0% 13.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 13.0%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 3.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst