Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video825 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jacob Elordi results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Confirmation Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 28.2% saturation with 929 hits. Analysis detected 3,904 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,300 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (4,754 of 16,562 topics). This Jacob Elordi is worse (more manipulative) than 71.30% of the peer group.
Jacob Elordi
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,300
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

71% percentile
025507510071.3% percentile
4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 28.1%28.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 19.9%19.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.2%5.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Anecdotal: Topic 28.1%, sitewide 5.2%Framing Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 19.9%, sitewide 1.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.6%AnecdotalSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos