Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,715 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Israel Palestinians Hamas War results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Hasty Generalization, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 826 hits. Analysis detected 3,233 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,860 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠15% (13,183 of 15,399 topics). This Israel Palestinians Hamas War is better (less manipulative) than 85.60% of the peer group.
Israel Palestinians Hamas War
Topic details
Total words: 6,860
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

14% percentile
025507510014.4% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.0%12.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos