Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,323 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Israel Lebanon Conflict results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.8% saturation with 1,210 hits. Analysis detected 4,764 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,808 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (8,032 of 16,562 topics). This Israel Lebanon Conflict is worse (more manipulative) than 51.50% of the peer group.
Israel Lebanon Conflict
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠52%Israel Lebanon Conflict (selected)4%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 5,808
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

52% percentile
025507510051.5% percentile
3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.9%7.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.0%11.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 12.0%12.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 20.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.4%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos