Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video824 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Israel Lebanon Ceasefire results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Out-Group Homogeneity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.2% saturation with 698 hits. Analysis detected 5,567 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,296 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (4,518 of 16,562 topics). This Israel Lebanon Ceasefire is worse (more manipulative) than 72.70% of the peer group.
Israel Lebanon Ceasefire
Topic details
Total words: 3,296
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

73% percentile
025507510072.7% percentile
4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 21.2%21.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.2%11.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 18.7%18.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 16.8%16.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Topic 4.9%4.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.8%9.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.3%15.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 26.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 21.2%, sitewide 3.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 18.7%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 16.8%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Tu Quoque: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 0.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.4%Composition/Division: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos