Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,884 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Israel Iran War results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 1,060 hits. Analysis detected 8,478 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,904 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (10,298 of 16,562 topics). This Israel Iran War is better (less manipulative) than 62.20% of the peer group.
Israel Iran War
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 9,904
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

38% percentile
025507510037.8% percentile
2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.9%8.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.2%7.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 9.9%9.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.7%10.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 9.9%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos