Topic summary
⁠55%1 analyzed article/video605 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ismail Haniyeh results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Halo Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 238 hits. Analysis detected 1,499 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,815 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (6,372 of 16,523 topics). This Ismail Haniyeh is worse (more manipulative) than 61.40% of the peer group.
Ismail Haniyeh
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,815
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

61% percentile
025507510061.4% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.4%7.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.1%13.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.0%6.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 8.7%8.7%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.9%Indoctrination: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos