Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos770 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Islamic State results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 58.5% saturation with 1,353 hits. Analysis detected 7,239 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,311 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 9.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠91% (1,414 of 15,526 topics). This Islamic State is worse (more manipulative) than 90.90% of the peer group.
Islamic State
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,311
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

91% percentile
025507510090.9% percentile
9.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 58.5%58.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 33.2%33.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 19.4%19.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 31.9%31.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 16.9%16.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 17.9%17.9%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 12.5%12.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 19.8%19.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 15.8%15.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 22.0%22.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Topic 58.5%, sitewide 26.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 33.2%, sitewide 6.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 31.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 22.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 19.8%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 19.4%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 17.9%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 16.9%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty Generalization: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 8.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 3.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 2.2%Halo Effect: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Bandwagon: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos