Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video728 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Irving Berlin results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, In-Group Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 17.2% saturation with 501 hits. Analysis detected 4,435 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,912 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (4,455 of 16,562 topics). This Irving Berlin is worse (more manipulative) than 73.10% of the peer group.
Irving Berlin
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠74%Irving Berlin (selected)5%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,912
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

73% percentile
025507510073.1% percentile
4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 17.2%17.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.5%7.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.2%13.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 7.7%7.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.5%6.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 13.1%13.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 5.9%5.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 17.2%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 8.1%Straw Man: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 0.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 7.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Bandwagon: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.1%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos