Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 400 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Irs Policy results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 80.7% saturation with 968 hits . Analysis detected 6,293 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,200 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 26.2% and a BS Rank of 100% (116 of 16,562 topics). This Irs Policy is worse (more manipulative) than 99.30% of the peer group. Irs Policy
Topic details
Total words: 1,200
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
99% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 99.3% percentile 26.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–100%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 80.7% 80.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 77.3% 77.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 73.8% 73.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 48.1% 48.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 44.3% 44.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 39.8% 39.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 38.8% 38.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 47.8% 47.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 23.4% 23.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 12.1% 12.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% 80% 80% 100% 100% Optimism Bias: Topic 80.7%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Topic 77.3%, sitewide 11.1% Framing Effect: Topic 73.8%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 48.1%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 47.8%, sitewide 15.9% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 44.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 39.8%, sitewide 4.0% Halo Effect: Topic 38.8%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Topic 23.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.4%, sitewide 3.3% Begging the Question: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.4%, sitewide 0.8% Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Red Herring: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.2% Primacy Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst