Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Iroquois Theatre Fire results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Hindsight Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 499 hits. Analysis detected 3,951 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,066 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Iroquois Theatre Fire is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Iroquois Theatre Fire
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
⁠0%Iroquois Theatre Fire (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 3,066
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 11.3%11.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 13.8%13.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.9%7.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.4%2.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.6%4.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.5%15.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 16.3%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 5.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.9%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos