Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 639 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iranian Heiress results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Self-Serving Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 25.7% saturation with 657 hits . Analysis detected 3,293 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,556 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.4% and a BS Rank of 79% (3,539 of 16,562 topics). This Iranian Heiress is worse (more manipulative) than 78.60% of the peer group. Iranian Heiress
Topic details
Total words: 2,556
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
79% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 78.6% percentile 5.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.2% 7.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 17.1% 17.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 10.3% 10.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 25.7% 25.7% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Topic 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 11.0% 11.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 25.7%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 15.9% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 3.7% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.7% Burden of Proof: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 0.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 2.7% Anecdotal: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.0% Begging the Question: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Horn Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.0% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Primacy Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst