Topic summary
90% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,893 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iran-Us War results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Self-Serving Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 1,480 hits . Analysis detected 11,822 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,217 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 55% (7,494 of 16,562 topics). This Iran-Us War is worse (more manipulative) than 54.80% of the peer group. Iran-Us War
Topic details
Total words: 9,217
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 54.8% percentile 3.2% BS Score4 analyzed articles9.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 14.8% 14.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 9.6% 9.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 11.2% 11.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.2% 0.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 3.7% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst