Topic summary
100% 1 analyzed article/video 126 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iran Saudi Relations results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 55.3% saturation with 209 hits . Analysis detected 943 faulty-reasoning hits from 378 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 15.6% and a BS Rank of 98% (483 of 16,562 topics). This Iran Saudi Relations is worse (more manipulative) than 97.10% of the peer group. Iran Saudi Relations
Topic details
Total words: 378
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
97% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 97.1% percentile 15.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles378 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 55.3% 55.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 47.1% 47.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 20.4% 20.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 19.1% 19.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 14.8% 14.8% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Topic 7.9% 7.9% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 7.9% 7.9% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 7.9% 7.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 7.4% 7.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 13.0% 13.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Negativity Bias: Topic 55.3%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Topic 47.1%, sitewide 26.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 20.4%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 19.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 9.1% False Dilemma: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 2.7% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% Anchoring Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 3.1% Loss Aversion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst