Topic summary
0% 8 analyzed articles/videos 8,239 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iran Peace Talks results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 4,068 hits . Analysis detected 29,092 faulty-reasoning hits from 37,288 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (13,685 of 15,269 topics). This Iran Peace Talks is better (less manipulative) than 89.60% of the peer group. Iran Peace Talks
Topic details
Total words: 37,288
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.4% percentile 1.6% BS Score8 analyzed articles37.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.9% 10.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst