Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,243 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iran Economy results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 625 hits. Analysis detected 3,949 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,972 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (9,116 of 16,562 topics). This Iran Economy is better (less manipulative) than 55.00% of the peer group.
Iran Economy
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,972
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

45% percentile
025507510045.0% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.4%10.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.6%12.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.3%6.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.0%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos