Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,044 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iran Crisis results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Unattributed Quote, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.9% saturation with 916 hits. Analysis detected 4,984 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,176 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (6,329 of 16,562 topics). This Iran Crisis is worse (more manipulative) than 61.80% of the peer group.
Iran Crisis
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,176
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

62% percentile
025507510061.8% percentile
3.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.0%8.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 17.3%17.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 8.1%8.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.1%11.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 21.9%, sitewide 19.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 17.3%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos