Topic summary
84%1 analyzed article/video835 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iot Security results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Appeal to Authority, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 19.1% saturation with 478 hits. Analysis detected 2,173 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,505 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 55% (7,475 of 16,562 topics). This Iot Security is worse (more manipulative) than 54.90% of the peer group.
Iot Security
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,505
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

55% percentile
025507510054.9% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 19.1%19.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.4%5.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 7.6%7.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.8%5.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.4%2.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Topic 19.1%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 7.6%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 4.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos