Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video425 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ios 27 Public Beta results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Overconfidence Bias, and Framing Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 159 hits. Analysis detected 1,086 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,700 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (8,962 of 16,562 topics). This Ios 27 Public Beta is better (less manipulative) than 54.10% of the peer group.
Ios 27 Public Beta
Topic details
Total words: 1,700
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

46% percentile
025507510045.9% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.0%6.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 9.3%9.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.4%2.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%No True Scotsman: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos