Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video483 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ioc Policy results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22.5% saturation with 217 hits. Analysis detected 759 faulty-reasoning hits from 966 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠89% (1,941 of 16,495 topics). This Ioc Policy is worse (more manipulative) than 88.20% of the peer group.
Ioc Policy
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 966
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

88% percentile
025507510088.2% percentile
7.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles966 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 12.0%12.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 22.5%22.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.0%9.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 5.4%5.4%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Topic 3.0%3.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 6.4%6.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 10.3%10.3%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 22.5%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 4.6%Bandwagon: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Nature: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.2%Begging the Question: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos