Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video750 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Interstate Water Policy results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, In-Group Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 44.8% saturation with 1,005 hits. Analysis detected 4,420 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,244 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠90% (1,677 of 16,562 topics). This Interstate Water Policy is worse (more manipulative) than 89.90% of the peer group.
Interstate Water Policy
Topic details
Total words: 2,244
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

90% percentile
025507510089.9% percentile
8.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 44.8%44.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 15.2%15.2%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 15.0%15.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 19.6%19.6%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 14.5%14.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 13.7%13.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.5%9.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 44.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 20.2%, sitewide 19.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 19.6%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 15.0%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 2.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 1.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 1.7%Special Pleading: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Red Herring: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.4%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Middle Ground: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos