Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,836 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Interstate Water Conflicts results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Self-Serving Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Slippery Slope as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 837 hits. Analysis detected 6,780 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,344 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (11,237 of 16,636 topics). This Interstate Water Conflicts is better (less manipulative) than 67.50% of the peer group.
Interstate Water Conflicts
Topic details
Total words: 7,344
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

33% percentile
025507510032.5% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.4%7.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.9%5.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 11.4%11.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 3.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos