Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video703 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Interracial Relationships results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 452 hits. Analysis detected 3,783 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,812 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (6,075 of 16,562 topics). This Interracial Relationships is worse (more manipulative) than 63.30% of the peer group.
Interracial Relationships
Topic details
Total words: 2,812
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

63% percentile
025507510063.3% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 16.1%16.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.3%11.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.2%13.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 15.3%15.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 6.6%6.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 1.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos