Topic summary
54% 1 analyzed article/video 843 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Interpersonal Conflict results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Negativity Bias , and Fundamental Attribution Error , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 177 hits . Analysis detected 1,642 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,529 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 29% (11,766 of 16,562 topics). This Interpersonal Conflict is better (less manipulative) than 71.00% of the peer group. Interpersonal Conflict
Topic details
Total words: 2,529
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.0% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 7.0% 7.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 7.5% Indoctrination: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 0.0% Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Burden of Proof: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.4% Primacy Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst