Topic summary
⁠67%1 analyzed article/video811 analyzed words
BS Summary: These International Visitors results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Halo Effect, and Anecdotal, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 270 hits. Analysis detected 2,090 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,433 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (8,985 of 16,562 topics). This International Visitors is better (less manipulative) than 54.20% of the peer group.
International Visitors
Topic details
Total words: 2,433
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

46% percentile
025507510045.8% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.5%4.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.5%4.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 11.1%11.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.7%1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Composition/Division: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos