Topic summary
16%1 analyzed article/video904 analyzed words
BS Summary: These International Sports Competitions results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Negativity Bias, and Recency Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 602 hits. Analysis detected 1,579 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,616 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 38% (10,415 of 16,562 topics). This International Sports Competitions is better (less manipulative) than 62.90% of the peer group.
International Sports Competitions
Topic details
Total words: 3,616
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

37% percentile
025507510037.1% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.3%3.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 16.6%16.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.6%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Horn Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.0%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.8%Composition/Division: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos