Topic summary
⁠85%1 analyzed article/video816 analyzed words
BS Summary: These International Seabed Authority results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19% saturation with 464 hits. Analysis detected 4,170 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,448 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (3,254 of 16,562 topics). This International Seabed Authority is worse (more manipulative) than 80.40% of the peer group.
International Seabed Authority
Topic details
Total words: 2,448
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

80% percentile
025507510080.4% percentile
5.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 18.7%18.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 16.0%16.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.9%11.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 13.0%13.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.6%5.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 5.8%5.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 4.4%4.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 16.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.9%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Topic 18.7%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.6%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos