Topic summary
59% 1 analyzed article/video 3,030 analyzed words
BS Summary: These International Order results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 1,132 hits . Analysis detected 10,499 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,120 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (12,628 of 16,562 topics). This International Order is better (less manipulative) than 76.20% of the peer group. International Order
Topic details
Total words: 12,120
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.8% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles12.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.3% 9.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Slippery Slope: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.7% Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst