Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video942 analyzed words
BS Summary: These International Kidnapping results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Fundamental Attribution Error, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 360 hits. Analysis detected 2,013 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,768 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠20% (13,247 of 16,562 topics). This International Kidnapping is better (less manipulative) than 80.00% of the peer group.
International Kidnapping
Topic details
Total words: 3,768
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

20% percentile
025507510020.0% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.6%9.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.8%3.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.8%1.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos