Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These International Buyers results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 38.3% saturation with 516 hits. Analysis detected 2,699 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,348 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This International Buyers is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
International Buyers
Topic details
Total words: 1,348
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 29.5%29.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 38.3%38.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 13.0%13.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 10.1%10.1%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 9.2%9.2%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 6.9%6.9%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 7.9%7.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 11.7%11.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 38.3%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 29.5%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 27.5%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 10.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 2.5%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.4%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos