Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video133 analyzed words
BS Summary: These International Assistance Impact results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Loss Aversion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 57.8% saturation with 229 hits. Analysis detected 763 faulty-reasoning hits from 396 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 17.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠98% (351 of 16,562 topics). This International Assistance Impact is worse (more manipulative) than 97.90% of the peer group.
International Assistance Impact
Topic details
Total words: 396
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

98% percentile
025507510097.9% percentile
17.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles396 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 57.8%57.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 30.6%30.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 37.1%37.1%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 17.4%17.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 11.6%11.6%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 10.3%10.3%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Topic 57.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 37.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 30.6%, sitewide 11.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 17.4%, sitewide 2.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 11.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 2.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 4.0%Primacy Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos